First, after I just posted a conversation on overly harsh reviews, I want to clarify that I am not bashing any particular genre, sub-genre, style, and certainly not particular authors.
Second — why, in the course of looking for images for this post, did I have to see so many great-looking titles that my local library system does not have?! Sigh…
Boy, I’m just full of whinging this week…
Anyway, this is something that’s becoming a big deal in my household. I have a 13-year-old, and there are certain things that I prefer he not read, watch, or take in — even if I can’t prevent him being exposed to it. I want him to understand that there’s a difference between what’s considered appropriate and tasteful at his age…versus, when he’s older.
I know I’m not the only parent struggling with this. My complaint is not with the content of novels — in terms of sexual references, substance use, violence, explicit language, that all boils down to free speech, I firmly believe, and one can choose to read it or not to read it. No, my big issue is this: The difference between Young Adult and New Adult needs to be clearly labeled.
For example, let’s look at the Jackaby series by William Ritter: There’s kissing, but no graphic sexual descriptions. Violence and some blood and gore, but around a PG-13 rating. And the violence is directly connected to proving the bad guys are the bad guys, not just for the apparent heck of it. There’s a little swearing, but again, nothing more than you’d find in an Avengers movie. I’d let my son read these books if he was interested in the story.
Now, let’s go to A Court of Thorn and Roses and A Court of Mist and Fury by Sarah J. Maas: These are fairytale re-tellings for the New Adult market. There are some hardcore intimacy scenes in these stories. Before anyone thinks I’m hating on this author, please refer to my above statement. I decided not to read this will-be trilogy, purely because I don’t care for the blatant bedroom scenes. It’s a personal preference. So, I can just politely ignore this selection, be glad for readers who are really enjoying it, and make a mental note not to recommend it to my 8th grader.
I want my kids to read. I want them to understand the magic of storytelling and how reading (fiction or non) can enlighten you, show you new things, get your mind working in new ways.
I don’t want them to think reading has to be only about particular topics, or “boring” content, or that there are all these “rules”. For example, that only girls can read/write romance stories. Or that only boys can enjoy military-themed dystopias.
The major thing I ask is that they not try to tackle something that, developmentally, they’re not ready for. Would people get really upset if I read Twilight or The Hunger Games to my toddler? Duh. Then I think it’s really not too much to want publishers to make a more clear distinction between their YA and their NA releases.
Right now, White Fang is struggling with Zeroes (S. Westerfield, M. Lanagan, D. Biancotti). I don’t blame him. I read the first chapter, and while it’s classified as YA, it should be YA for age 17 and up. These characters are going to clubs and on dates and almost committing crimes, and all that is not something the average middle-schooler in suburbia can relate to.
I’ve heard a lot of college students have enjoyed this book. Good for them. It totally proves my point.
The reason White Fang ended up with this selection, though, is because everything else in the library he’s either already read, not interested in, or now outgrown. When people classify middle grade and YA fiction, they apparently go from ages 10 and 11 straight to 16 and over.
As an Early Childhood graduate, I am very aware that every developmental stage is important, and presumably I’m not alone in this. So why does there not seem to be a market for the 12 to 14-year-olds? A few decades ago, people complained that there weren’t enough books aimed specifically at ages 13 to 17 — hence the YA genre was born. But now that we know even more, scientifically and socially, about where these “tweens” are cognitively and emotionally, why do we still insist on trying to lump them into some other category? Why the rush?
And why are we so determined to make adolescents into 21-year-olds? What’s the point?
We need to go back to what our kids need, not what makes the most money. We need to redefine the categories again. And then we need to respect it.